OnlineBookClub.org

This is a discussion topic for the May 2024 Book of the Month, "Neither Safe Nor Effective (2nd Edition): The Evidence Against the COVID Vaccines" by Dr. Colleen Huber.


Do you think this book would change people's perspective on vaccines in general?

I think this will change people’s view on vaccines because t
Dr.Huber put so much extensive research into this book. There is a lot of research on how the vaccines effect physical performance, fertility rates and actually getting the coronavirus.

There are many things that are explained concerning vaccines and I'm sure that many people don't know about them, so I'm very sure that the book will change many people's view on vaccines.

According to me, yes, I think this book will certainly change the perspective on vaccines for those who don't have any concrete views or research on the topic. But talking about the people who have a strong opinion on this topic, they may simply agree or disagree with his point of view. 

The book was very well written and contains many scientific sources and studies. But there's this issue: some people are so fanatical and narrow-minded that they won't even want to hear the other side of the story.

I'm looking forward to reading this book. Does it present research on how vaccines can be positive and beneficial, like it does for ineffective? Or is it more opinionated from that aspect?

It's possible that "Neither Safe Nor Effective (2nd Edition): The Evidence Against the COVID Vaccines" by Dr. Colleen Huber could influence some people's perspectives on vaccines in general, particularly those who are already vaccine-hesitant or skeptical of medical interventions. However, it's important to note that the book presents a specific viewpoint that may not be representative of the broader scientific consensus on COVID-19 vaccines.

For individuals who are already hesitant about vaccines, this book could reinforce their existing beliefs and potentially contribute to further vaccine hesitancy. On the other hand, individuals who trust in the scientific and medical communities may approach the book's claims with skepticism and seek out additional, credible sources of information.

Ultimately, the impact of this book on people's perspectives on vaccines in general will likely vary depending on individual beliefs, prior knowledge, and willingness to critically evaluate the evidence presented. It's crucial for readers to consider the broader context of scientific research and consult reputable sources when forming opinions on vaccination and public health interventions.

I don't think so. Nowadays, although it may be hard to say, very few people read, and those who do generally have a preconceived idea that they confirm with reading, regardless of whether they are for or against it.

I think it may help people understand the importance of vaccines altogether.

This book obviously changed my perspective about vaccination and I definitely do think it would do same for most readers who are abit more free-minded.

I think that because Dr. Huber spent so much time and effort researching this book, people's opinions of vaccinations will shift. Numerous studies have been conducted on the effects of vaccinations on reproductive rates, physical performance, and coronavirus infection.

Indeed. If people read carefully they can understand what vaccines are about or what they truly represent, which in the vast majority of cases do not have good effects on the health well-being of the population.

Yes, I believe so. Not just about the COVID 19 vaccine, others too. Some have even advised close friends not to collect any type of vaccine and immunization, especially the free ones.

"Neither Safe Nor Effective" by Dr. Colleen Huber might reinforce vaccine hesitancy in skeptics, but readers should consider broader scientific consensus and consult reputable sources.

I believe this book can change the perspective on vaccines for those without concrete views or research. However, those with strong opinions may simply agree or disagree with the author's point of view.