Presentation of different timelines compared to biblical prophecy...

[Donald Trust]

It was fascinating. I think the ability of them trying to balance the two concepts of religion and science can go a long way in understanding the end of the days.

[Odowgu kenso]

The author did marvelously well trying to reconcile science with religion. This was one thing that made this book exceptional. This book to an extent strengthened my faith in future events.

[Charles lib]

I think the author did great to connect this book to science and everything in it seems so true.

[Jane Ogwang]

Science agreeing with the Bible timelines obviously strengthens my faith in religion even more. I'm, however, skeptical of the authors' literal interpretation of the years.

[Okonobe Chioma Chukwuma]

For my confidence in future events to be strengthened, science does not need to refute the Bible. Daily examples of how the Bible is applied to people's lives are sufficient evidence for me to believe in God.

[Unique Mary Iloakasia]

The book really helped to bridge the gap between science and religion. The author excelled at this very well.

[Roderick Voss]

Although I didn't agree with all the authors wrote, I did appreciate their imagination and ingenuity.

[Jakub Bystrowski]

Science doesn't need to prove the Bible for my faith to be enhanced. I believe in the Bible because it is the word of God not because some scientists proved it long ago.

[Mercylib]

One of the things I love most about this book is the merging of science and religion. I believe in both, that is why I agree with the author completely on that. It unites us all.