What did you like least about this book?

[Adrea and Travis Bock]

I personally really enjoyed this book but it was so dry in some historical parts that I got the most use out of the audio version. I followed along in the written as times but the audio worked great in the car. I could slow down how fast they spoke too and understand the more academic terminology.
As a lover of history- this book had some great points in it especially in chapters 2, 4 and 10.
I did NOT like chapter 6-8 about the civil war through korean war. So dry, and the narrative was not very relatable to our present day. The old history they touched on had more on how history is repeating itself.

[Anthony Edwards 4]

This could be the lack of focus on specific industries you're interested in, or a desire for more in-depth case studies of successful businesses.

[Zicker Angel]

The focus on past successes was unrealistic because it can't be compared to what an average business person face today. I want more details on challenges faced by today's entrepreneurs. The focus on only America businesses is a bit limiting but worth learning something from it.

[Linda Daniels 1]

The author made use of some terminologies that are ambiguous

[Nenye Lauraa]

There was nothing I liked least about the book. I know that sounds impossible, however, I can't make any choice on what was best or least. Everything was just good.

[Henry Chude]

"Launchpad Republic" by Howard Wolk and John Landry offers insightful perspectives on America's entrepreneurial spirit, but one notable shortcoming is its occasionally overly optimistic narrative. The authors emphasize the successes of the U.S. entrepreneurial ecosystem while downplaying the systemic challenges and barriers that many entrepreneurs face, such as unequal access to capital and the impact of socioeconomic disparities. This imbalance can make the book seem somewhat idealistic, lacking a critical examination of the broader economic and social context that shapes entrepreneurial success. Additionally, the book sometimes presents historical anecdotes and case studies without fully integrating them into a cohesive argument, which can make the narrative feel disjointed. These factors may leave readers seeking a more nuanced analysis of the complexities within America's entrepreneurial landscape.

[Onwuesi Promise]

This book is quite complex and full of discoveries. I even had to do research on some discoveries. I loved the book though regardless of it's complexity but I think many individual will not appreciate it's complexity.

[Onyinyechi Obi]

For me everything about the book was spot on. I understood what both authors wanted to say. I enjoyed the stories the told and there was a lot to learn.

[Eobi jonh]

This book definitely pushes the reader a bit. There were sections where I had to consult other resources to fully grasp the concepts. If you're looking for an intellectual challenge, this is a great pick.

[Udeh N]

I occasionally notice that authors inundate readers with an abundance of details, a characteristic that I personally don't view negatively, given my familiarity with this style of writing. However, I acknowledge that inquisitive readers who are not accustomed to delving into complex texts may find this approach overwhelming. While I don't perceive it as a drawback, it's worth noting that individuals who prefer more straightforward narratives might struggle to fully appreciate the depth and richness of such books. Ultimately, the level of detail presented can significantly impact the reading experience, catering to diverse preferences and levels of engagement.

[Onuoha Joy]

To an extent, this book seemed a bit difficult to read as I had to really on other materials to understand some sections of this book. This book is definitely for above average readers.

[Benny Rach]

In "Launchpad Republic" by Howard Wolk and John Landry, what I liked least was the challenging writing style, which at times felt packed with information and complex ideas, making it difficult to read and understand. The narrative could be overwhelming, particularly for readers not well-versed in economic theory. Despite these issues, the book remains an educational read, and I still rate it 5 out of 5 stars.

[Marcell Icarus]

The use of some difficult terminologies which might make it uneasy for some people. I think it could have been better if it was all said in simpler terms.

[Nessa Vee]

I have to admit that authors can sometimes inundate readers with too much information. The book could benefit from more details on the entrepreneurial path outside of the American framework.

[Meena Jangid]

I admired how well met the authors have done to provide the explanation for America’s entrepreneurial success by considering both historical and cultural factors, though I think the comprehensive view of this landscape could be obtained if they looked at the influence of government policies.